Personal tools
Document Actions

Land resource

Up one level

3.1.2  Land resource

Historically, the land resource of the Dnipro Basin has been intensively used for a number of different purposes (Figure 3.2). Three fifths of the Basin area have lost their original natural landscape features as a result of highly intensive land use. About 50% of the territory is occupied by agriculture, the majority of which is arable farmland occupying an area of 38,500,000 hectares. Of that, 20.8% is in Russia, 18.5% in Belarus, and 60.7% in Ukraine, the major agricultural land user in the Basin.

Table 3.2    River flow distribution pattern in the Dnipro Basin

Basin Section

River flow distribution between the countries, % of the total annual river flow in the Basin

 

Belarus

Russia

Ukraine

Average year

Water-scarce year

Average year

Water-scarce year

Average year

Water-scarce year

Source/Russian border

-

-

6.9

7.3

-

-

Russian border/Ukrainian border *

20.5

24.1

6.9

7.0

0.2

0.2

Pripyat River Basin

11.7

12.2

-

-

14.0

11.6

Kyiv reservoir tributaries **

0.3

0.2

-

-

2.5

1.7

Desna River Basin

-

-

13.8

16.9

5.8

3.2

Kanev and Kremenchug reservoir tributaries ***

-

-

-

-

5.9

3.6

Tributaries in the section between the Kremenchug HPS and Kakhovka HPS

-

-

2.2

3.3

7.8

8.5

Tributaries downstream of Kakhovka HPS

-

-

-

-

1.5

0.2

Total in the mouth section,

million m3

16921

11367

15503

10724

19586

9023

Total in the mouth section, %

32.5

36.5

29.8

34.5

37.7

29.0

*

**

     ***

 Pripyat, Desna, Psyol and Vorskla are not included

 Teteriv, Irpen etc.

 Sula, Ros etc.

 

Table 3.3  River water resource distribution pattern in the Dnipro Basin

 

Basin Section

Flow input into the section, million m3

Flow generated within the section, million m3

Average year

Water-scarce year

Average year

Water-scarce year

Source/Russian border

-

-

3566

2269

Russian border/Ukrainian border *

3566

2269

14391

9744

Pripyat River Basin

-

-

13298

7378

Kyiv reservoir tributaries **

31255

19391

1501

593

Desna River Basin

-

-

10229

6242

Kanev and Kremenchug reservoir tributaries ***

42985

26226

3061

1137

Tributaries in the section between the Kremenchug HPS and Kakhovka HPS

46046

27363

5167

3681

Tributaries downstream of Kakhovka HPS

51213

31044

797

70

Total in the mouth section,   million m3

-

-

52010

31114

*

**

***

Pripyat, Desna, Psyol and Vorskla are not included

Teteriv, Irpen etc.

Sula, Ros etc.

 

Approximately 10% of the Basin area has been designated for land reclamation purposes, 4% is occupied by urban centres and about 1-4% has been lost due to construction of reservoirs and impoundments.

 

The Russian part of the Upper Dnipro Basin occupies the central, western and south-western parts of the Central Russian Upland, mainly consisting of extensive areas of hills and plains intersected by lowland rivers, gorges and valleys. Soil cover in this part of the Basin is represented by fertile loamy soils lying in the north, dark-grey and grey forest soils in the western part of the Central Russian Upland, and very fertile black-earth soils in the south-west.


Figure 3.2 Land use in the Dnipro Basin

 

Of the total area of the Russian part of the Dnipro Basin, 52% (or 5.3 million hectares) is used for agricultural purposes (of that, 4.3 million hectares is used for arable agriculture). In Russia, the area of agricultural land has reduced over recent years. This is due to a number of factors including land conversion to non-agricultural uses, loss of cultivatable land due to an increase in shrubs, and mineral resource and peat extraction operations. As much as 600,000 hectares of farmland have been affected by water erosion and over 400,000 hectares have been classified as areas susceptible to erosion.

 

The Belorussian section of the Dnipro Basin (116,400 km2) is occupied by 44.7%, or 5.2 million hectares of agricultural land. Of this, 3.4 million hectares is used for arable agriculture, 0.8 million hectares is designated as grassland, and 0.9 million hectares is used as pastures.

 

The Belorussian Polessie, extending into the southern part of Belarus mainly consists of lowland wetlands and marshes and represents one of the major wetland resources in Europe. Between the mid-1960s to 1980s, a major land drainage scheme was implemented in this part of the Basin to provide over 2 million hectares of land for agriculture, which has led to a loss of over 50% of the natural wetland area. Currently, former peat bog soils in this area have become depleted, leading to a continuous reduction of crop productivity. Land drainage activities have had a profound impact on the environment, manifested in large-scale soil erosion, land degradation and a higher susceptibility to flooding effects resulting in the contamination of water resources.

 

Radioactive contamination is considered to be the major environmental problem in the Belorussian part of the Dnipro Basin. Extensive areas of agricultural land were contaminated by 137CS as a result of the Chernobyl accident and 265,400 hectares were withdrawn from agricultural use for this reason. Approximately 1.2 million hectares of Belorussian agricultural land contaminated by 137CS (>1 Cu/km2) is located in the Dnipro Basin (Figure 3.3).

 


 

Figure 3.3 Belorussian agricultural land contaminated by 137CS in the Dnipro Basin

 

The land resource of the Ukrainian part of the Dnipro Basin is 29.14 million hectares, or 48.6% of the country territory. Of that, 32.8% lies in the Ukrainian Polessie zone, 39.9% in the Forest Steppe zone and 26.6% in the Steppe zone. Generally, the land resource within the Forest Steppe and Steppe zones has been intensively used for arable agriculture, urban and industrial development purposes.

 

Intensive agricultural and industrial activities, transport network development, urbanisation and industrialisation have all led to a degradation of the land resource. This has resulted in the progressive deterioration of the environment due to increasing anthropogenic pressures and has had a profound effect not only on this resource, but also on the state of the Dnipro River itself.

 

© 2005-2009 UNDP-GEF Dnipro Basin Environment Programme All Rights Reserved